There is something for everyone in the long-awaited World Bank report, Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? In some sections there is a damning critique, in others a positive spin, with a narrative offering a bright future. Not surprising then that the press has picked up different angles in the few days since its release. The Financial Times, for example, headlines with “World Bank backs farmland investment”, while Bloomberg reports the World Bank as saying, “Large Land Deals Threaten Farmers”. Both are equally valid interpretations of an often ambiguous report. The bottom-line, take-home message seems to be that external investment in land is a good thing in some places, especially those where there are “large tracts of suitable land, but also a large proportion of smallholders with very low productivity”, but that governance measures, based on a set of high-sounding principles, are required to make this happen equitably and sustainably. But what does this mean? How should we interpret this report?
- Renamo’s new war rhetoric October 27, 2013
- Antena 1 – Entrevista a Alexandre Abreu January 16, 2013
- ‘Africa rising’: TIME magazine agrees with The Economist November 26, 2012
- Las causas de la guerra: más allá de la barbarie y la codicia November 23, 2012
- The Causes of the Sierra Leone Civil War October 25, 2012
Notícias por categorias